Jeg ville ikke være kravløs, jeg ville være krevende, jeg ville være i stand til å få kravene oppfylt, før de forsvant, jeg vil ha kravene og behovene mine tilbake.
For no one attracted her more; his hands were beautiful, and his feet, and his voice, and his words, and his haste, and his temper, and his oddity, and his passion, and his saying straight out before every one, we perish, each alone, and his remoteness. (He had opened his book.) But what remained intolerable, she thought, sitting upright, and watching Macalister’s boy tug the hook out of the gills of another fish, was that crass blindness and tyranny of his which had poisoned her childhood and raised bitter storms, so that even now she woke in the night trembling with rage and remembered some command of his; some insolence: “Do this,” “Do that,” his dominance: his “Submit to me.”
What art was there, known to love or cunning, by which one pressed through into those secret chambers? What device for becoming, like waters poured into one jar, inextricably the same, one with the object one desire? Could the body achieve it, or the mind, subtly mingling in the intricate passages of the brain? or the heart? Could loving, as people called it, make her and Mrs Ramsay one? for it was not knowledge but unity she desired, not inscriptions on tablets, nothing that could be written in any language known to men, but intimacy itself, which is knowledge, she had thought, leaning her head on Mrs Ramsay’s knee.
Jeg sier ikke at Agnes Løv ikke er gripende; hun er det i aller høyeste grad. Litt klosset formulert, kanskje - det jeg mente var at nærhet ikke er nødvendig for å komme innpå en karakter. Distansen til Agnes, og hennes distanse til andre, er intenst, selv om vi ikke befinner oss like nære karakteren som for eks i Knausgård og Min Kamp.
Denne, og flere av Rune Christiansens romaner, er som diktene hans i lenger format. Det er ikke fortellingen som er viktig, det er observasjonene, assosiasjonene, det språklige som driver teksten fremover. Jeg for min del synes han skriver presist, poetisk og akkurat så intellektuelt som jeg vil ha det. Oppdager alltid en eller annen bok eller film når jeg leser ham - det er noe fint med en forfatter som ikke undervurderer leserne sine. Altfor mange forventer at slike bøker skal være mer enn de er: ikke alle bøker er plot og 'gripende' karakterer.
Every year, the memories I have of my father become more faint, unclear and distant. Once they were vivid and true, then they became like photographs, and now they are more like photographs of photographs. But sometimes, at rare moments, a memory of him will return to me with such suddenness and clarity that all the feeling I've pushed down for years springs out like a jack-in-the-box. At these moments, I wonder if this is the way it feels to be my mother.
The pain of forgetting: the spine. The pain of remembering: the spine. All the times I have suddenly realized that my parents are dead, even now, it still surprises me, to exist in the world while that which made me has ceased to exist; my knees, it takes half a tube of Ben-Gay and a big production just to bend them. To everything a season, to every time I’ve woken only to make the mistake of believing for a moment someone was sleeping beside me: a hemorrhoid. Loneliness: there is no organ that can take it all.
At the end, all that's left of you are your possessions. Perhaps that's why I've never been able to throw anything away. Perhaps that's why I hoarded the world: with the hope that when I died, the sum total of my things would suggest a life larger than the one I lived.
Synes egentlig boka var bra jeg, selv om språket hennes var litt for stivt av og til, litt vel påtatt (men etter å ha lest intervjuer med henne om Ladies, vet jeg at det er litt av poenget). Skjønner ikke hvorfor hun introduserte en helt ny karakter på slutten der, det virker litt som hun ikke vil løse det hun har skrevet seg inn i? Slutten hadde vært bedre uten ham og den epilogen.
Skjønner ikke helt hvorfor dere er skuffet over boka, metanivået i den er jo helt fantastisk! Selv om den kunne vært noe strammere enkelte plasser, tror jeg ikke boka hadde blitt noe bedre av effektivisering. Tempoet er helt i takt med Charles Balandas sinnstilstand, mener jeg da.
Tror hun bruker Stein-Finland som et bilde på den finske bygda.