Bokelskere.no

De sier at et menneske ikke har levd dersom det ikke var idealist i ungdommen, men at det heller ikke har lært noe av livet dersom det ikke er konservativ som gammel.

Rundstykket var tørt, og inni var den tynneste osteskiven jeg noensinne hadde sett.
Hadde den vært tynnere, ville jeg ikke fått øye på den.

I was surprised that among so many men of genius who had directed their inquiries towards the same science, that I alone should be reserved to discover so astonishing a secret.

Remember, I am not recording the vision of a madman.
The sun does not more certainly shine in the heavens than that which I now affirm is true.
Some miracle might have produced it, yet the stages of the discovery were distinct and probable.

After days and nights of incredible labour and fatigue, I succeeded in discovering the cause of generation and life;
nay, more, I became myself capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter.

The astonishment which I had at first experienced on this discovery soon gave place to delight and rapture. After so much time spent in painful labour, to arrive at once at the summit of my desires was the most gratifying consummation of my toils.
But this discovery was so great and overwhelming that all the steps by which I had been progressively led to it were obliterated, and I beheld only the result.

What had been the study and desire of the wisest men since the creation of the world was now within my grasp.

I see by your eagerness and the wonder and hope which your eyes express, my friend, that you expect to be informed of the secret with which I am acquainted;

that cannot be; listen patiently until the end of my story, and you will easily perceive why I am reserved upon that subject.
I will not lead you on, unguarded and ardent as I then was, to your destruction and infallible misery.
Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge ...

When I found so astonishing a power placed within my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it.

Although I possessed the capacity of bestowing animation,
yet to prepare a frame for the reception of it, with all its intricacies of fibres, muscles, and veins, still remained a work of inconceivable difficulty and labour.
I doubted at first whether I should attempt the creation of a being like myself, or one of simpler organization;
but my imagination was too much exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life to an animal as complex and wonderful as man.

The materials at present within my command hardly appeared adequate to so arduous an undertaking, but I doubted not that I should ultimately succeed.
I prepared myself for a multitude of reverses; my operations might be incessantly baffled, and at last my work be imperfect,

yet when I considered the improvement which every day takes place in science and mechanics, I was encouraged to hope my present attempts would at least lay the foundations of future success.
Nor could I consider the magnitude and complexity of my plan as any argument of its impracticability.

It was with these feelings that I began the creation of a human being.
As the minuteness of the parts formed a great hindrance to my speed, I resolved, contrary to my first intention, to make the being of a gigantic stature, that is to say, about eight feet in height, and proportionably large.
After having formed this determination and having spent some months in successfully collecting and arranging my materials, I began.

No one can conceive the variety of feelings which bore me onwards, like a hurricane, in the first enthusiasm of success.
Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds, which I should first break through,
and pour a torrent of light into our dark world.

A new species would bless me as its creator and source;
many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me.
No father could claim the gratitude of his child so completely as I should deserve theirs.

Pursuing these reflections, I thought that if I could bestow animation upon lifeless matter, I might in process of time (although I now found it impossible) renew life where death had apparently devoted the body to corruption.

These thoughts supported my spirits, while I pursued my undertaking with unremitting ardour.

" I got to see the results of vaccination on their kidneys "

It may seem odd that a medical doctor with 19 years of experience
has passionately turned away from the practice of vaccination.

(..) Like most doctors, I received a cursory summary of the
childhood and adult vaccine schedules
and was told that vaccines are safe and effective
and to give them on schedule.
I never questioned the vaccine schedule and was largely
agnostic about it.

After nearly two decades of working in the conventional medical
system, several things converged to launch me into a new way
of thinking.
I never would have predicted that the medical establishment
would present itself to me as a blatant violator of life
or conflict with my moral and spiritual principles . . .
but it did.

..during the winter of 2009 when the H1N1 flu vaccine was given
as a separate injection from the seasonal flu vaccine ..
Many doctors were skeptical of the practice of influenza
vaccination, and many of my hospital colleagues signed some
exemption form and dodged the vaccine for themselves.

However, there were trusting patients who did not have the
discernment to refuse, and I got to see the potential result
of vaccination on their kidneys.

That winter, three patients in close succession were wheeled into
the emergency room of my hospital with total kidney shutdown.

When I arrived to talk to them, each one volunteered to me,
“I was fine until I had that vaccine.”

All three had normal kidney function at baseline, as per
their outpatient records. All three required acute dialysis,
two eventually recovered, and one died of complications
several months later, supposedly from his other illnesses.

After this series of events, I began to take vaccine histories
on each of my patients and was startled at the connections
that could be made just by asking, “When was your last vaccine?”

In my opinion, many cases of supposedly idiopathic (medical term
for unknown) kidney disease are not idiopathic at all.

During the weeks of dialyzing the three kidney-failure patients,
I passed the chief of internal medicine in the hallway.
He was someone I had always had a good relationship with,
and we were on excellent terms.
He asked me the usual, “How are you doing? How is the
nephrology practice going?”
I decided to tell him what was happening and how I thought
the flu vaccine was causing problems.
After conveying a small bit of my observations, he became stiff,
his face tightened, his body language changed,
and he asked me why I was blaming the vaccine.
“They just got the flu, and the vaccine didn’t have time to work,”
was his curt response.

Over the following months, I first made it my business to find out
everything I could about safety trials for vaccines in kidney patients.

I was shocked to find that there were no trials on these types of patients.
I was told they could tolerate vaccines because these are “safe
and effective.”
On seeing that safety of vaccines in acutely ill (active heart failure,
sepsis, cancer, autoimmune disease) and chronic nephrology patients
was a myth,
I decided to research the chief of internal medicine’s assumptions
about the flu vaccine, smallpox, and polio history.

What I encountered threw me into a tailspin that ultimately led me
to become a full time researcher on the immune system and vaccination.

I came to realize that the guidelines, evidence, and opinions
of the leaders were unsound
and were NOT leading the herds to authentic health.

What was most puzzling to me was how I was treated when I tried
to protect my own kidney-failure patients from being vaccinated —
especially when they were ill.

After an attempt to get the hospital to defer vaccinating for
pneumonia and influenza until the day of hospital discharge
instead of admission,
I was told not to interfere with the vaccination protocol.

( / / )

This was the first time in my career that my opinion regarding
kidney failure was not respected.
Any other time I suggested that a drug was responsible for
kidney damage, that drug was immediately discontinued —
no questions asked.
This happens routinely with certain blood pressure drugs,
antibiotics, pain killers, etc.

Sometimes kidneys can react to drugs in an allergic fashion —
to any drug at any time — and that drug would have been stopped.
Some drugs cause direct toxicity to the kidneys,
and in the past if I suggested to stop or avoid them,
they were always avoided.
But now I was unable to protect my own kidney-failure patients
from vaccinations given in the hospital.

Questioning the vaccines seemed to open an entire Pandora’s box
that apparently had yellow tape over the lock,
along with the message, “Do not cross.”
I was met with doublespeak —
permitted to write an order to stop a vaccine that was to be given
if I got there in time, but I was also told that I was doing it
too often
and that I should not interfere with the hospital’s vaccination policy.

When I pointed out the connection between vaccines and worsening
or new-onset kidney failure to a couple of open-minded colleagues,
they understood, started taking vaccine histories,
and saw what was happening.
Yet they remained silent.

Most doctors continue to practice with comfortable indifference.

Some see the errors, damage, and limits of their practices but still
walk lockstep with the herd and protect the brotherhood.

I don’t know what it will take to get these doctors to resist the
dictates who rule over them.
I’ve had far more success reasoning with parents and intelligent people
who are not attached to traditions
that are damaging, unscientific, and not even supported by our own
medical literature.

This book is for those who want to read what I have discovered, after
years of research,
to be a much more accurate depiction of vaccination history.

( Suzanne Humphries, MD -- grundig forelesning over boken her )
  Dissolving Illusions: The Information You Wish You Had Known Before

SANITATION versus VACCINATION - a 1912 book (J.T.Biggs) i overblikk
-

'Helseverket':

Given what we now know about the powerful contaminant SV-40,

it was a miracle that
the polio inoculation program was not a giant disaster.

..In 1972, the World Health Organization
let an elite audience of scientists know that

funding would be available to those who would pursue the creation
of a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans

By 1978, the Olympians showed the enormity of their ambitions.
N.S.C Memorandum #46 — the "King Alfred Plan" —
discussed one possible solution to the black nationalist movement
in the U.S.:
stopping the growing birth rate among blacks in America by the year
2000, using several types of deadly viruses.
This was actually written and circulated at the highest levels
of government in 1978.

AIDS did not exist in the United States prior to 1978.
Not in humans, not in stored blood; not anywhere —
except in the laboratories.
No American was infected with AIDS.
All U.S. AIDS infection has occurred since the preparation of the
"King Alfred" National Security Memorandum.

"Contaminated vaccines made in tissue cultures of animal parts
contain 'extra dangerous viruses'
and WHO smallpox vaccine doses may have been contaminated in this
fashion. According to investigations carried out by a team of
doctors from the Walter Reed Hospital,
there is a definite connection between vaccines and AIDS."

..it was a miracle that the polio inoculation program was not
a giant disaster.
Many so-called "flu shots" during the presidency of Gerald Ford
also contained SV-40,
which may account for the fact that

over twenty percent of those who received the shots
became seriously ill
and many died.

In 1977 the government denied that SV-40 contamination of
vaccines was deliberate.

The preponderance of evidence suggests that the government was —
and still is — lying.

Even as late as 1992, it was not known whether SV-40 is searched
for in AIDS victims. The terrible danger here is that
according to intelligence documents, SV-40 can lie dormant
and then be "reactivated" or "triggered" when needed,
which can also happen with HIV and two or three AIDS-related
complex viruses.

..AIDS did not exist in the United States prior to 1978.

Not in humans, not in stored blood; not anywhere —
except in the laboratories.
No American was infected with AIDS. All U.S. AIDS infection
occurred since the preparation of the "King Alfred"
National Security Memorandum.

The "King Alfred Plan" revealed that
the U.S. government had been collecting blood types
of every nation on earth.

These samples were given to virologists at Fort Detrick — ..
..the former Soviet Academy of Science in Novisibirsk ..
reported that blacks were more likely than whites
to become infected with the virus.
They would also have a shorter incubation period before
showing symptoms, and earlier death.

..people with a certain Gc 1 gene were predisposed to the HIV
virus, while a Gc 2 gene offered some protection.
As one intelligence report said,

"Extensive research .. came up with the conclusion that blacks
and mulattos have Gc 1 genes while whites have Gc 2 genes.
This, the team said, meant that Africa and Brazil would be the most
likely places in which the AIDS epidemic might start —
and where it would flourish.

This is believed to be the principle upon which the decision to
infect Africa and Brazil with AIDS first was based.
After that, they only had to find a means of delivering the AIDS
virus to large numbers of people —

and the World Health Organization found it."

The cover for the introduction of AIDS into Africa and Brazil —
with its large black population — would be the World Health
Organization's massive "humanitarian" campaign to
"eradicate smallpox for once and for all."

It was perfect. It even matched the surest way to pass
the virus: injection.

The WHO smallpox vaccines would be contaminated with the AIDS
virus.
The dangerous viral agent chosen to contaminate the vaccines
was SV-40,
an idea which sprang from the results of a near disaster
years earlier with contaminated Salk Polio Vaccine.

Until 1962, SV-40 — which caused cancer in animals — was contained
in polio vaccine shots,

and research work in the Soviet Union and Holland had concluded
that the SV-40 virus was widespread in bovine serum,
including fetal calf serum (BIV).

Fort Detrick virologists discovered that the loci of scores of genes
related to the body's immune system are located on chromosome 14.

They also found that SV-40 has a strong affinity for chromosome 14.

The scientists reported that this was the link —
the attack by SV-40 on chromosome 14—which caused polio, cancer,
leukemia and immune suppression.

The story of SV-40 first appeared publicly in "Human Exposures to
SV-40: A Review and Comment," an article by noted epidemiologists
N. Nathanson and K. Shah,
published in the American Journal of Epidemiology.
(Vol 103, No.1, January, 1976.)
The article said that in the 1950s, millions of Americans were
exposed to the papova virus SV-40,
a common and unrecognized contaminant which had been prepared
from virus pools grown in simian monkey kidney cultures.

In February 1977, in "Science That Frightens Scientists,"
published in the Atlantic Monthly,
William Bennett and Joel Gurin confirmed that millions of people
in the U.S. were "inadvertently" injected with simian virus 40.

Subsequently it was confirmed that the Salk polio vaccine was
cultured in kidneys from African green monkeys.
This may have given rise to the myth that a man bitten by a green
monkey contracted AIDS, which then developed into the present
AIDS epidemic.
As preposterous as it is, this fable is still one of the most
accepted theories about the genesis of AIDS.
/

Shortly after the World Health Organization's smallpox vaccination
program was completed, serious outbreaks of AIDS occurred in
Central Africa and Brazil.
As early as 1984, several intelligence services — ranging from U.S.
allies such as French intelligence and the Vatican
to enemies such as the KGB and Libyan intelligence
(which had access to sensitive information from the then highly
efficient Rumanian intelligence service ) —
began circulating internal reports that the U.S. was running
experiments with contaminated vaccines in human inoculations.

In 1985 The World Health Organization sent one if its top
officials to soothe the anxiety of African governments
whose people were suffering a wildfire of AIDS infection.

He was supposed to deliver the official WHO message: AIDS was
"no problem."
But once the WHO official saw the situation first hand,
he refused.

Yet WHO continued to insist that the problem of AIDS in Africa
was being grossly exaggerated.

( fulltekst )

Slik det het seg at eskimoene hadde uendelig mange ord for snø, hadde Moskvas innbyggere mange uttrykk for svartebørsen. Alt, bortsett fra livets mest grunnleggende nødvendigheter, måtte kjøpes "venstrehånds". Mange slike kjøp var direkte kriminelle: Man fant en fyr som smuglet dongeribukser fra Vesten, og betalte ham et skyhøyt beløp. Andre var verken lovlige eller ulovlige. For å kjøpe et radioapparat eller et teppe måtte man kanskje skrive seg på en venteliste; men man kunne hoppe til toppen av listen "gjennom tyngde": hvis man var et menneske med innflytelse som hadde makt til å gjengjelde tjenesten; eller "gjennom vennskap", hvis man hadde en venn eller slektning som var i en posisjon til å manipulere listen. Så omfattende var køsnikingen at de fleste moskovitter trodde at ingen noensinne kom på toppen av en liste simpelthen ved å vente på tur.

Den søvnige stasjonsbygningen lå innringet av popler og lønnetrær og gjespet i morgensolen,

"Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly. Or
the current death rates must go up. There is no other way."

( Robert S. McNamara - Secretary of Defense, 1970 )

..Thus was born the AIDS virus.

[ inside the top-secret U.S. Chemical and Bacteriological Warfare
laboratories at Fort Detrick, Maryland ]

This was not a well-meant endeavor that went haywire.
This was not the work of a mad scientist.

This was a project coldly calculated to discover whether a new virus
could be created
that would decimate a population in a seemingly "natural" plague.
The experiments were concluded in 1967.

The Chemical and Bacteriological Warfare labs were under heavy
pressures to produce deadly new weapons. With the Vietnam War raging,

relations between the two great superpowers had deteriorated to worse
than ever.
There was real paranoia in both governments about the other's
intentions and capabilities.
So in 1969, it came as a terrible shock for those in the know
when British and U.S. intelligence discovered alarming evidence

that a team of Soviet virologists, working under Victor Zhdanov —
then the top virologist in the Soviet Union — had successfully
isolated a retrovirus from human leukemia cells contaminated with
"fetal calf serum."
That put the Soviets ahead in this weapons race!
It took a while longer for the Western labs to demonstrate how
human leukemic cells could host the growth of bovine visna virus.

This would explain why veterinarians participated in the Fort
Detrick "trials,"

and why the U.S. government subsequently gave Dr. O. W. Judd,
a leading veterinarian, $8.5 million to study leukemia

when human leukemia does not occur in animals.

Why was a leukemia study conducted at a Harvard veterinarian
college?
Intelligence reports shed some light. Researchers at Fort Detrick
were in possession of all of the documentation on the unsuccessful
forty-year search for a vaccine to counter maedi-visna in sheep
and eight-year search for a vaccine to counter infectious
anemia in horses.

The experiments included infectious anemia of horses, a lentivirus
and a cousin of leukemia in humans.

The tests were to see whether the new "cocktail" could be carried
to humans by horseflies ( its normal methods of transmission;
it is not a sexually transmitted disease in horses )
and by other stinging insects.
In frequency of infection and efficiency of "contact," the tests
using human tissue were successful in establishing infection.
/

The significance of this lies in the fact that elements of all three
viruses — horse and sheep and bovine — appear in humans infected
with the AIDS virus.

It is also significant that these are "retroviruses." When they
penetrate a cell, they actually alter its genetic content.
Which is exactly what happens when a person becomes infected with
the HIV virus.
The sheep maedi-visna retrovirus closely resembles the HIV virus.

The bovine visna so closely resembles the HIV virus that it was
actually called, at the time, BIV — bovine immunodeficiency-like virus.

The race was on. Congress was quietly notified on July 1, 1969
of the new biogenetic weaponry...

A Department of Defense expert on biological warfare, Dr. McArthur,
in testimony before the House Appropriations Committee actually
described what we now know as the AIDS virus:

"Within the next five-to-ten years," he said, "it probably will be
possible to make a new infective microorganism
which would differ in certain important aspects from any known
disease-causing organism.

Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the
immunological and therapeutic process upon which we depend
to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.

The total cost of such a program, which we could complete in five
years, is in the region of $10 million."

He made these statements more than a decade before the first reported
AIDS case in America!
/

"Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly. Or
the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.

There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up.
In a thermonuclear age, we can accomplish it very quickly.

Famine and disease are nature's ancient checks on population growth,
and neither one has disappeared from the scene."

One intelligence source informed us that McNamara was alluding to
the development of new bacteriological warfare methods —
and that he actually discussed them with certain carefully selected
delegates after the conference.

..In 1972, the World Health Organization
let an elite audience of scientists know that

funding would be available to those who would pursue the creation
of a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans:

"An attempt should be made to see if viruses can, in fact, exert
selective effects on immune functions. The possibility should be
looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be
impaired if the infecting virus damages more or less selectively
the cell responding to the virus."
(World Health Bulletin, 1972, 47, 257 and Fed Proc 1972 31:1087)

By 1978, the Olympians showed the enormity of their ambitions.
National Security Council Memorandum #46 — which became known among
the few who were privy to it as the "King Alfred Plan" —
discussed one possible solution to the black nationalist movement
in the U.S.:
stopping the growing birth rate among blacks in America by the year
2000, using several types of deadly viruses.
This was actually written and circulated at the highest levels
of government in 1978.

AIDS did not exist in the United States prior to 1978.
Not in humans, not in stored blood; not anywhere —
except in the laboratories.
No American was infected with AIDS.
All U.S. AIDS infection has occurred since the preparation of the
"King Alfred" National Security Memorandum.

"Contaminated vaccines made in tissue cultures of animal parts
contain 'extra dangerous viruses'
and WHO smallpox vaccine doses may have been contaminated in this
fashion. According to investigations carried out by a team of
doctors from the Walter Reed Hospital,
there is a definite connection between vaccines and AIDS."

( kildetekst >