Blanco oppfordring til spiritisme ?

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow

Liljene på marken blir ikke engang eksaminert for sin
'reason for being',
så diktsitatet vil antyde et elementært, insistent
bevis for 'being in itself',
eksistensen man ikke utfordrer med legitimasjonskrav -

altså en peker til et så å si botanisk, desto elementært
Gudsbevis, 'essential being' being elementary name of God.

en elementær, alvorlig formodning som den interesserte kan
styrke ved å søke i særdeles utbredt verdenslitteratur
og ledetråden "Jødene, Deres majestet" - nok et hurtigbevis.

Jeg foretrekker endog keeping in mind hvor brannfarlig
utfordring perspektivet må bli for den fundamental-tvilende
ateist -- som må ha 'ikke-eksistens' til please å være den
elementært rådende evige nullitet.
Brått slått ut av markens liljer.

Fundament-ateisten må bli en storbruker av etsende plantevern-
midler til forsvarsformål:
En evig bekjempelse av elementært manifesterende eksistens --
'even the possibility'.

Forstanden må ha sine egne grunner til å spille på lag med
Hjertelaget, [ for å utdype Pascal litegrann fritt ]

'The Jews exist'

Godt sagt! (1) Varsle Svar

..to show how the medical system takes the brightest of students,
the cream of the crop -- and turns them into trained technicians,

slowly killing commonsense and their hopes of seeing lasting cures.

The training dampens their initiative and traps them in blinkered
thinking patterns, beneath a dangling guillotine of huge student
loans that hang over their necks indefinitely.

Medical training leads doctors into one of two factions:
The first one contains the happy automatons, content to ride the
money wave.
The other group is a well-kept secret; a clan of empty shells
harboring the frustrated walking dead.
At such an inference, most of them will not thank you because they
dont even know they are dead.
If you try to revive them, they might punch you in the face.

just maybe this book will help people understand why patients feel
unheard, and how difficult, but rewarding it is for a doctor to
come alive.

Se også Suzannes hovedopus >

Godt sagt! (1) Varsle Svar

Når man blir ansatt i NRK, begynner man ikke straks å lage
retningslinjer. Man begynner å lage programmer.

( kildetekst )

Godt sagt! (1) Varsle Svar

ja, hvor og når i historien har vi ikke slaveri gående?

slik det måtte oppfattes om du var et lavt priviligert
humant inventar der og da..

-illu-

i verste fall bære underkastelsestegn...

en kunne spørre i luken hos wikipedantene :

de liker detaljer, og erkjenner vel at uverdige menneskeretts-
forhold ikke er noen sjeldenhet
selv kloss inn på våre brukbart diskusjonsåpne sivilisasjoner.

At det finnes visse ukrenkelige rettigheter, som vi håper
majoritetseierne skal helligholde like høyt som vi gjør.

Men i vår freidighet kunne vi nevne fremmedarbeidere i disses
egne land,
rettsløse [industri]slaver som bare har sulten i dagslønn den dag
det passer "arbeidsgiveren"/ arbeider-eieren å bytte dem ut og
sette dem "utenfor porten".

Men byggetegningene til de drastiske frihetsinngrep som vår tids
keisere har på timeplanen,
spørs det om wikipediatet kan føle seg FRI til å skissere ?

i sånt er de likevel bakspeil-historikere,
tro om de ser kursen vår tids mono-tenkning styrer?

Der kan vi trenge perspektiver fra bl.a. denne analytiker :

‘Global RESET’ Calls For Technocracy

Technocracy The Masterplan

Full gass for full overvåkning

Diktatur: alltid veldig Vitenskapelig

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

Hvorfor skulle vi slippe inn deg på flyet, når du ikke har
E-legitimasjon på Smittefri Snute ?

Her kommer Covid-Klasseskillet ikraft

Neste fase: Hvorfor skulle vi slippe Deg inn på Kjøpesenter
ULTIM 999, når du ikke er E-Sertifisert I Orden?

eller Hvorfor skulle vi la deg få korthandle mat på denne
Nærings- og Nyte-Automaten,
når du har uoppgjorte minuspoeng i BorgerPliktregnskapet?

Fase 1 er under oppstart, se Detaljer her .

BorgerPliktregnskapet? Kina har det i full drift .

Momenter for hvorfor du burde få fly, om du ønsker deg så vondt:

Attesten din kan regelmessig være helt misvisende.
Daglig er du jo ute i farlige verden og kan bli smittet,
med coronaviruset 'Vanlig forkjølelse' - eller et enda farligere
krigsvirus som ligner det sterkt.

Du får et grassiøst strev med å holde attesten gyldig,
kan den gis for mer enn selve reisedagen?
Da må det bli en helt feltmessig , dermed maksimalt upålitelig
test. Selv de angivelig mer labb-messige er tvilsomme nok.

-ill testing-

Størst risiko er det for at steindøde småbiter av virus slår
falsk alarm, og du bråstoppes med kofferten i halsen.

Du kan dertil bli godkjent enda du faktisk brygget på 'noe',
og all protest og debatt vil dermed bare tydeliggjøre at
her behøves ganz andere Methoden:
Umulig forskning og utvikling må skje i brølende hast -
før immunisering har slått rot og farenivået er like lavt
som for en høstforkjølelse.

Og skal du være brått fradømt sivile rettigheter hvis du har
valgt å kutte ut alt abonnement på mobile tjenester ?

Vel oppmøtt i det nye 'fellesskapet' som vurderer deg daglig
om du må utvoteres, som trassig eller bare inkompetent til å
få være en av Oss.

/ /

Relaterte notater

Falsk-positive tester i bøttevis

DNA-based vaccines that will literally change your body’s DNA.

GENSLØYD er ikke VAKSINE !

Frankenstein har ikke gitt opp:

virusmekking og sapiens-redigering:

“Self-spreading vaccines are essentially genetically engineered
viruses designed to move through populations in the same way
as infectious diseases, but rather than causing disease, they
confer protection.

Obviously, much could go wrong using such an approach ."

Obviously, ganske kvalifisert innsikt i endel dilemma knyttet til
tekno-avansert Krigsforskning,
hva med et psykisk virus som fjerner fiendens evne til aggresjon?
( bestill i ruten nedenfor hvis du er forsvarsminister.)

Kilden oppfatter seg faktisk som sterkt 'nøktern og konvensjonell'
vitenskap, vi som permanent redigerer fasiten.

syntetisk-genomisert : Sapiens 2.x-dyret

fra ur-tidlig forskningsrapport : kunstnerens motivasjon og kall

( 2b continued )

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

Prosjektbeskrivelse begynner her >

og en av mange bra innledninger , her

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

De sier at et menneske ikke har levd dersom det ikke var idealist i ungdommen, men at det heller ikke har lært noe av livet dersom det ikke er konservativ som gammel.

Godt sagt! (3) Varsle Svar

Rundstykket var tørt, og inni var den tynneste osteskiven jeg noensinne hadde sett.
Hadde den vært tynnere, ville jeg ikke fått øye på den.

Godt sagt! (5) Varsle Svar

Rights.no utnevner "Norges modigste prest":

"Jesus står for frihet, Muhammed for tvang"

Så enkelt og evangelisk kan det med fordel sies.

Det islamske presteskap er opprørt bare over tanken på at
deres allah kan ha en sønn:
Der er det dødsstraff for å ymte slikt, bl.a. i Pakistan.

Norske politikere vil ha det systemet løs hos oss .

Jesus er ikke bare et 'genialt teologisk konsept', han er
evig Gud av Gud, fra før noen teologsjel var født.

"svært mye ved den politiske religionen islam er unorsk
og trolig i strid med norsk lov og norske verdier:
Barneekteskap, tvangsekteskap, jødehat, homohat, synlig
diskriminering av kvinner m.v.", fastslår journalist R.Prang
i lenken over.

I grunnleggende teologiske konsepter kan det nok hende jeg
må ta reservasjoner mot endel av hva Gelius fører i bagasjen.
Men at teologer burde kunne si ting enkelt, støtter jeg !

Godt sagt! (4) Varsle Svar

I was surprised that among so many men of genius who had directed their inquiries towards the same science, that I alone should be reserved to discover so astonishing a secret.

Remember, I am not recording the vision of a madman.
The sun does not more certainly shine in the heavens than that which I now affirm is true.
Some miracle might have produced it, yet the stages of the discovery were distinct and probable.

After days and nights of incredible labour and fatigue, I succeeded in discovering the cause of generation and life;
nay, more, I became myself capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter.

The astonishment which I had at first experienced on this discovery soon gave place to delight and rapture. After so much time spent in painful labour, to arrive at once at the summit of my desires was the most gratifying consummation of my toils.
But this discovery was so great and overwhelming that all the steps by which I had been progressively led to it were obliterated, and I beheld only the result.

What had been the study and desire of the wisest men since the creation of the world was now within my grasp.

I see by your eagerness and the wonder and hope which your eyes express, my friend, that you expect to be informed of the secret with which I am acquainted;

that cannot be; listen patiently until the end of my story, and you will easily perceive why I am reserved upon that subject.
I will not lead you on, unguarded and ardent as I then was, to your destruction and infallible misery.
Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge ...

When I found so astonishing a power placed within my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it.

Although I possessed the capacity of bestowing animation,
yet to prepare a frame for the reception of it, with all its intricacies of fibres, muscles, and veins, still remained a work of inconceivable difficulty and labour.
I doubted at first whether I should attempt the creation of a being like myself, or one of simpler organization;
but my imagination was too much exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life to an animal as complex and wonderful as man.

The materials at present within my command hardly appeared adequate to so arduous an undertaking, but I doubted not that I should ultimately succeed.
I prepared myself for a multitude of reverses; my operations might be incessantly baffled, and at last my work be imperfect,

yet when I considered the improvement which every day takes place in science and mechanics, I was encouraged to hope my present attempts would at least lay the foundations of future success.
Nor could I consider the magnitude and complexity of my plan as any argument of its impracticability.

It was with these feelings that I began the creation of a human being.
As the minuteness of the parts formed a great hindrance to my speed, I resolved, contrary to my first intention, to make the being of a gigantic stature, that is to say, about eight feet in height, and proportionably large.
After having formed this determination and having spent some months in successfully collecting and arranging my materials, I began.

No one can conceive the variety of feelings which bore me onwards, like a hurricane, in the first enthusiasm of success.
Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds, which I should first break through,
and pour a torrent of light into our dark world.

A new species would bless me as its creator and source;
many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me.
No father could claim the gratitude of his child so completely as I should deserve theirs.

Pursuing these reflections, I thought that if I could bestow animation upon lifeless matter, I might in process of time (although I now found it impossible) renew life where death had apparently devoted the body to corruption.

These thoughts supported my spirits, while I pursued my undertaking with unremitting ardour.

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

Hvordan skyte ned 'upassende' fakta?

Fagnøytralitet, ærlighet i forskning og folkeopplysning -

må den 'ubestikkelige' nøkternheten øke med pengemakt-stablenes
høyde?
Hva metoder finnes for å 'hamre fast' offentlig sannhet?

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his
salary depends on his not understanding it.”
[ Upton Sinclair ]

Bry seg om å føre holdbare bevis, når de færreste kan kjenne
igjen et klokkerent bevis om de møter det på gaten, eller ved
middagsbordet?

Propaganda-bransjen har satset sterkt på frykt, beskjemmelse:
Fakta kan svertes, røklegges, gjøres til noe upassende,
som sikkert avslører mine dårlige motiver, søler meg til:
belastede ord viser min ukyndighet, jeg er visst offer for
leie 'folkelige misforståelser'?
Slik snor de det til.

"Let us say that your product causes harm (cancer, brain damage,
… whatever).
One option would be to admit the problem, notify the media,
pull the product from the market, and compensate the victims.

Instead many companies choose the following:
• Suppress the evidence of harm as long as possible, then deny harm
• Raise doubt about the scientific evidence and point to other causes
• Fund your own biased studies to confound the actual science
• Claim the science isn’t settled

In other words: delay, obfuscate, deny, muddy the waters and
point fingers.
This is, of course, the tactic employed by the tobacco industry
when evidence arose linking tobacco to lung cancer.

The approach was so successful in delaying/ minimizing regulation
that it has become the go-to strategy for industry and lobbying
groups embroiled in allegations of product harm
whether the compound of concern is lead, asbestos, aromatic amines,
vinyl chloride, beryllium, Freon, or deacetyl (an artificial
flavor that gives microwave popcorn a buttery flavor and also
causes lung damage). ...

The approach is summed up in an early internal tobacco industry
memo which stated:
Doubt is our product, since it is the best means of competing
with the ‘body of fact’ that exists in the minds
of the general public.
It is also the means of establishing a controversy.”

It’s an ideal strategy and despite the fact that they keep running
the same play over and over again, it continues to work …
every single time.
And if scientific evidence eventually triumphs, these tactics
serve to delay regulation, allowing industry to continue to profit
from the activity despite the ongoing harm."

'Fakta' er altså noe skrot som samler seg i konsumentenes
udisiplinerte hjerner,
hvor stoffet egentlig kan bekjempes ved kjente krigsmidler.

Michaels' bok er blitt fremhevet av forsker Einar Flydal ,
som ikke er fornøyd med giga-telebransjens nøkternhet der de
serverer 'helt nødvendige' fremskritt
da de kan se ut til å true folkehelsen, biologi og klima og evt.
utslette all den sivilisasjonen de skulle tjene.

Ja, må vi pro fortissimo ha glippfri spillefilm i tele-bamsene
der vi seiler makelig på Mjøsa ?
om tjenesten skader oss og våre eventuelt anskaffbare barn?

( filmsnutt her )

Kyndige omtaler hos Goodreads :

mer om teleterror og slikt :

" The Orwellian strategy of dismissing research conducted by the
scientific community as "junk science"
and elevating science conducted by product defense specialists
to "sound science" status also creates confusion
about the very nature of scientific inquiry and undermines
the public's confidence in science's ability ... "

"Teknokrati ?"

Herja konsumenter kan også like : >

samme emnehylle:

Godt sagt! (1) Varsle Svar

" I got to see the results of vaccination on their kidneys "

It may seem odd that a medical doctor with 19 years of experience
has passionately turned away from the practice of vaccination.

(..) Like most doctors, I received a cursory summary of the
childhood and adult vaccine schedules
and was told that vaccines are safe and effective
and to give them on schedule.
I never questioned the vaccine schedule and was largely
agnostic about it.

After nearly two decades of working in the conventional medical
system, several things converged to launch me into a new way
of thinking.
I never would have predicted that the medical establishment
would present itself to me as a blatant violator of life
or conflict with my moral and spiritual principles . . .
but it did.

..during the winter of 2009 when the H1N1 flu vaccine was given
as a separate injection from the seasonal flu vaccine ..
Many doctors were skeptical of the practice of influenza
vaccination, and many of my hospital colleagues signed some
exemption form and dodged the vaccine for themselves.

However, there were trusting patients who did not have the
discernment to refuse, and I got to see the potential result
of vaccination on their kidneys.

That winter, three patients in close succession were wheeled into
the emergency room of my hospital with total kidney shutdown.

When I arrived to talk to them, each one volunteered to me,
“I was fine until I had that vaccine.”

All three had normal kidney function at baseline, as per
their outpatient records. All three required acute dialysis,
two eventually recovered, and one died of complications
several months later, supposedly from his other illnesses.

After this series of events, I began to take vaccine histories
on each of my patients and was startled at the connections
that could be made just by asking, “When was your last vaccine?”

In my opinion, many cases of supposedly idiopathic (medical term
for unknown) kidney disease are not idiopathic at all.

During the weeks of dialyzing the three kidney-failure patients,
I passed the chief of internal medicine in the hallway.
He was someone I had always had a good relationship with,
and we were on excellent terms.
He asked me the usual, “How are you doing? How is the
nephrology practice going?”
I decided to tell him what was happening and how I thought
the flu vaccine was causing problems.
After conveying a small bit of my observations, he became stiff,
his face tightened, his body language changed,
and he asked me why I was blaming the vaccine.
“They just got the flu, and the vaccine didn’t have time to work,”
was his curt response.

Over the following months, I first made it my business to find out
everything I could about safety trials for vaccines in kidney patients.

I was shocked to find that there were no trials on these types of patients.
I was told they could tolerate vaccines because these are “safe
and effective.”
On seeing that safety of vaccines in acutely ill (active heart failure,
sepsis, cancer, autoimmune disease) and chronic nephrology patients
was a myth,
I decided to research the chief of internal medicine’s assumptions
about the flu vaccine, smallpox, and polio history.

What I encountered threw me into a tailspin that ultimately led me
to become a full time researcher on the immune system and vaccination.

I came to realize that the guidelines, evidence, and opinions
of the leaders were unsound
and were NOT leading the herds to authentic health.

What was most puzzling to me was how I was treated when I tried
to protect my own kidney-failure patients from being vaccinated —
especially when they were ill.

After an attempt to get the hospital to defer vaccinating for
pneumonia and influenza until the day of hospital discharge
instead of admission,
I was told not to interfere with the vaccination protocol.

( / / )

This was the first time in my career that my opinion regarding
kidney failure was not respected.
Any other time I suggested that a drug was responsible for
kidney damage, that drug was immediately discontinued —
no questions asked.
This happens routinely with certain blood pressure drugs,
antibiotics, pain killers, etc.

Sometimes kidneys can react to drugs in an allergic fashion —
to any drug at any time — and that drug would have been stopped.
Some drugs cause direct toxicity to the kidneys,
and in the past if I suggested to stop or avoid them,
they were always avoided.
But now I was unable to protect my own kidney-failure patients
from vaccinations given in the hospital.

Questioning the vaccines seemed to open an entire Pandora’s box
that apparently had yellow tape over the lock,
along with the message, “Do not cross.”
I was met with doublespeak —
permitted to write an order to stop a vaccine that was to be given
if I got there in time, but I was also told that I was doing it
too often
and that I should not interfere with the hospital’s vaccination policy.

When I pointed out the connection between vaccines and worsening
or new-onset kidney failure to a couple of open-minded colleagues,
they understood, started taking vaccine histories,
and saw what was happening.
Yet they remained silent.

Most doctors continue to practice with comfortable indifference.

Some see the errors, damage, and limits of their practices but still
walk lockstep with the herd and protect the brotherhood.

I don’t know what it will take to get these doctors to resist the
dictates who rule over them.
I’ve had far more success reasoning with parents and intelligent people
who are not attached to traditions
that are damaging, unscientific, and not even supported by our own
medical literature.

This book is for those who want to read what I have discovered, after
years of research,
to be a much more accurate depiction of vaccination history.

( Suzanne Humphries, MD -- grundig forelesning over boken her )
  Dissolving Illusions: The Information You Wish You Had Known Before

SANITATION versus VACCINATION - a 1912 book (J.T.Biggs) i overblikk
-

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

kalkulert etter antatt næringsbehov for min lille statist
Skratle Veritass, som vil bli bokbrannmelder. - Møt Skratle her

Suppleres e. vurderte brandmeldelser

'Statist' - blir det 'person som tenker stort om Storstaten',
engasjert tilhenger av vår alles Offentlige Omsorg Ovenfra ?


Godt sagt! (2) Varsle Svar

(forklare barnet ditt) -- Se nå på den morsomme snurre-armen
som vil Laaangt opp i nesa di, vær nå flink lille Skratle!

-ill.1-

len hodet ditt til bøylen og sitt stille, bomullpinnen skal
kloss opptil hjernen din, hjernevask er sunt, det er så fint
vi har så myndigheter til å fatte vedtak om hva vi alle Må.

Må til, om vi skal være sunne og føle trygghet i samfunnet.

Se, tante Snythild fant seg så pent i det.

-ill.2-

De skumleste urenhetene sitter ikke så langt opp i nesa di,
men pinnen skal skubbe møkka kloss bakerst, opp til hjernen
og skrubbe dødsfarlig skramme. Får vi blodinfeksjon og dør,
så døde vi for Fellesskapet og Tryggheten, er det ikke fint?
Hva hjertens fryd vi får for skattepengene!

Armen føler seg ikke frem, bare måler skallen din og beregner
hvor dypt det kan passe å drille.
'Offentlig Barbarimaskin' kunne lages billigere på den måten,
vanlig produksjonsrobot.

På generalprøven satt en sivilingeniør ute i bildekanten med
skjerm og håndklaver, klar til å taste Ctrl+Alt+DEL ifall
panikk og blodspill, han er visst ikke her idag - men disse
GrønneKors-frivillige operatørene er sikkert kyndige i
robotikktakk og taktikk, gått 3 dagers kurs.

Vi får se etter en kul barnebok til deg om skandaler i helsevesen,
hvis du sitter pent nå. De har sikkert noe pedagurkisk til å
styrke pliktgleden og massemoralen, du ønsker deg vel fin bok?

"Like Being Stabbed in the Brain" -

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

'Helseverket':

Given what we now know about the powerful contaminant SV-40,

it was a miracle that
the polio inoculation program was not a giant disaster.

..In 1972, the World Health Organization
let an elite audience of scientists know that

funding would be available to those who would pursue the creation
of a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans

By 1978, the Olympians showed the enormity of their ambitions.
N.S.C Memorandum #46 — the "King Alfred Plan"
discussed one possible solution to the black nationalist movement
in the U.S.:
stopping the growing birth rate among blacks in America by the year
2000, using several types of deadly viruses.
This was actually written and circulated at the highest levels
of government in 1978.

AIDS did not exist in the United States prior to 1978.
Not in humans, not in stored blood; not anywhere —
except in the laboratories.
No American was infected with AIDS.
All U.S. AIDS infection has occurred since the preparation of the
"King Alfred" National Security Memorandum.

"Contaminated vaccines made in tissue cultures of animal parts
contain 'extra dangerous viruses'
and WHO smallpox vaccine doses may have been contaminated in this
fashion. According to investigations carried out by a team of
doctors from the Walter Reed Hospital,
there is a definite connection between vaccines and AIDS."

..it was a miracle that the polio inoculation program was not
a giant disaster.
Many so-called "flu shots" during the presidency of Gerald Ford
also contained SV-40,
which may account for the fact that

over twenty percent of those who received the shots
became seriously ill
and many died.

In 1977 the government denied that SV-40 contamination of
vaccines was deliberate.

The preponderance of evidence suggests that the government was —
and still is — lying.

Even as late as 1992, it was not known whether SV-40 is searched
for in AIDS victims. The terrible danger here is that
according to intelligence documents, SV-40 can lie dormant
and then be "reactivated" or "triggered" when needed,
which can also happen with HIV and two or three AIDS-related
complex viruses.

..AIDS did not exist in the United States prior to 1978.

Not in humans, not in stored blood; not anywhere —
except in the laboratories.
No American was infected with AIDS. All U.S. AIDS infection
occurred since the preparation of the "King Alfred"
National Security Memorandum.

The "King Alfred Plan" revealed that
the U.S. government had been collecting blood types
of every nation on earth.

These samples were given to virologists at Fort Detrick — ..
..the former Soviet Academy of Science in Novisibirsk ..
reported that blacks were more likely than whites
to become infected with the virus.
They would also have a shorter incubation period before
showing symptoms, and earlier death.

..people with a certain Gc 1 gene were predisposed to the HIV
virus, while a Gc 2 gene offered some protection.
As one intelligence report said,

"Extensive research .. came up with the conclusion that blacks
and mulattos have Gc 1 genes while whites have Gc 2 genes.
This, the team said, meant that Africa and Brazil would be the most
likely places in which the AIDS epidemic might start —
and where it would flourish.

This is believed to be the principle upon which the decision to
infect Africa and Brazil with AIDS first was based.
After that, they only had to find a means of delivering the AIDS
virus to large numbers of people —

and the World Health Organization found it."

The cover for the introduction of AIDS into Africa and Brazil —
with its large black population — would be the World Health
Organization's massive "humanitarian" campaign to
"eradicate smallpox for once and for all."

It was perfect. It even matched the surest way to pass
the virus: injection.

The WHO smallpox vaccines would be contaminated with the AIDS
virus.
The dangerous viral agent chosen to contaminate the vaccines
was SV-40,
an idea which sprang from the results of a near disaster
years earlier with contaminated Salk Polio Vaccine.

Until 1962, SV-40 — which caused cancer in animals — was contained
in polio vaccine shots,

and research work in the Soviet Union and Holland had concluded
that the SV-40 virus was widespread in bovine serum,
including fetal calf serum (BIV).

Fort Detrick virologists discovered that the loci of scores of genes
related to the body's immune system are located on chromosome 14.

They also found that SV-40 has a strong affinity for chromosome 14.

The scientists reported that this was the link —
the attack by SV-40 on chromosome 14—which caused polio, cancer,
leukemia and immune suppression.

The story of SV-40 first appeared publicly in "Human Exposures to
SV-40: A Review and Comment," an article by noted epidemiologists
N. Nathanson and K. Shah,
published in the American Journal of Epidemiology.
(Vol 103, No.1, January, 1976.)
The article said that in the 1950s, millions of Americans were
exposed to the papova virus SV-40,
a common and unrecognized contaminant which had been prepared
from virus pools grown in simian monkey kidney cultures.

In February 1977, in "Science That Frightens Scientists,"
published in the Atlantic Monthly,
William Bennett and Joel Gurin confirmed that millions of people
in the U.S. were "inadvertently" injected with simian virus 40.

Subsequently it was confirmed that the Salk polio vaccine was
cultured in kidneys from African green monkeys.
This may have given rise to the myth that a man bitten by a green
monkey contracted AIDS, which then developed into the present
AIDS epidemic.
As preposterous as it is, this fable is still one of the most
accepted theories about the genesis of AIDS.
/

Shortly after the World Health Organization's smallpox vaccination
program was completed, serious outbreaks of AIDS occurred in
Central Africa and Brazil.
As early as 1984, several intelligence services — ranging from U.S.
allies such as French intelligence and the Vatican
to enemies such as the KGB and Libyan intelligence
(which had access to sensitive information from the then highly
efficient Rumanian intelligence service ) —
began circulating internal reports that the U.S. was running
experiments with contaminated vaccines in human inoculations.

In 1985 The World Health Organization sent one if its top
officials to soothe the anxiety of African governments
whose people were suffering a wildfire of AIDS infection.

He was supposed to deliver the official WHO message: AIDS was
"no problem."
But once the WHO official saw the situation first hand,
he refused.

Yet WHO continued to insist that the problem of AIDS in Africa
was being grossly exaggerated.

( fulltekst )

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

Og hva er måneskinnet?
Annenhånds solskinn. Svekket, forfalsket.

Godt sagt! (6) Varsle Svar

I min første ungdom led jeg mye fordi jeg ikke var vakker, og i min brennende lengsel etter å være vakker synes jeg at jeg var et uhyre av heslighet. Nå vet jeg at jeg ser ut omtrent som folk flest. Det gjør meg heller ikke videre glad. Jeg synes ikke spesielt godt om meg selv, verken skallet eller innmaten. Men jeg vill ikke være en annen.

Godt sagt! (3) Varsle Svar

Man vil bli elsket, i mangel av det å bli beundret, i mangel av det å bli fryktet, i mangel av det å bli avskydd og foraktet. Man vil inngi menneskene en eller annen slags følelse. Sjelen skjelver av skrekk for tomrommet og ønsker kontakt for enhver pris.

Godt sagt! (4) Varsle Svar

Psykologisk triller fra begynnelsen av 1900-tallet. Handlingen baserer seg på tankene til en lege i Stockholm. Legen begår etter hvert et mord for å frigi en kvinne han er forelsket i. Legen er ensom og det er fremfor alt betraktninger rundt dette og andre eksistensielle temaer, samt monologen om å ta et annet menneskes liv som gjør denne boken til en av de beste jeg har lest på lenge.

Godt sagt! (3) Varsle Svar

Sist sett

Kristin_John LarsenSigrid Blytt TøsdalEirin EftevandKirsten LundHilde Merete GjessingHilde H HelsethIngunn SsiljehusmorTove Obrestad WøienAgnesJoakimVibekeLene AndresenDaffy EnglundKorianderBjørg L.Aud Merete RambølAstrid Terese Bjorland SkjeggerudElisabeth SveeStein KippersundHarald KEli HagelundNinaMorten JensenalpakkaEirik RøkkumPiippokattaIngeborg GBeathe SolbergSigmundRagnar TømmerstøGro-Anita RoenRisRosOgKlagingIngebjørgKjell F TislevollHeidi LJulie StensethGunillaSissel Elisabeth