Bokelskere.no

I do not believe that controversy is harmful on general
grounds. - It is not controversy and open differences
that endanger democracy.
On the contrary, these are its greatest safeguards.

It is an essential part of democracy that substantial
groups, even majorities, should extend toleration to
dissentient groups, however small and however much their
sentiments may be outraged.
In a democracy it is necessary that people should learn
to endure having their sentiments outraged ...

_

( obs skummel gli i oppfatningen av glosen 'kontrovers' )

kan KATALOGverk STRAFFE negre, eller Jøder ?

What would happen if the phone company started deciding about
who could have a listing in their master directory?
What if they simply dropped out people who were discovered to
be Republicans or Democrats?
What if they deleted people because they had a certain skin
color? Or national origin? Or religion?

While on one hand, the phone company was willing to connect and
charge for service in everybody’s home,
those suppressed individuals would only be able to make
outbound calls and they would seldom receive any inbound calls.

Would America ever tolerate this? Of course not.
In fact, it would spark a national uproar of epic proportions.

So, can anyone explain why Google is getting a free pass on hiding
the particulars of its indexing algorithms from public consumers
of information?

It would be bad enough if Google simply dropped out certain pieces
of information, but they have gone way beyond this by rearranging
the results it chooses to release and presenting them
in such a manner to show an alternate reality that purposely
misleads the public.

This is what is called “weaponizing data”
to actively and intentionally lead people to false conclusions
in order to modify their behavior.

To say this is wrong is an understatement.
To say it is illegal is complicated, but it is certainly possible.

Inngrep annonsert KEISERLIG nok? >

( kilde: technocracy.news )

"Google has now flatly stated its intent to influence and control
public perception so as to manipulate and determine national
political election outcomes.
It does this by using AI algorithms to skew search results,
presenting their political views, and suppressing dissenting or
alternative views.

lett å fikse?

..urimelig å tilskrive politimester Bastian feighet som
grunnleggende karaktertrekk. Han holder uredd fast på sin
overbevisning, slik den er uttrykt i Kardemomme-loven.
Men han er ikke særlig modig i direkte konfrontasjoner.
Hans motvillighet mot å arrestere vitner om det.

Men det manglende motet i konkrete situasjoner skyldes
også et tredje forhold: Politimesteren vil misforstå, for
ifølge hans filosofi vil Kardemomme-loven triumfere nettopp
ved at konfrontasjoner unngås!

Det rettssosiologiske bildet av samfunnet og mennesket som
ligger under K-loven, tilsier at kriminalitet bekjempes ved
at konflikter unnngås for enhver pris.
Og hvis dette skjer, er både virkelighetsbildet og K-loven
empirisk og moralsk bekreftet.
Kardemomme-samfunnets selvforherligelse er både rituell
selvbekreftelse og selvoppfyllende profeti.
Politimester Bastians praksis skaper sin egen rettferdig-
gjørelse ved å produsere de data som trengs, og samtidig
forhindre at motstridende data får lov til å dukke opp
innenfor bymuren!

( tekst )

China’s ‘Social Credit System’ Is Dystopian Nightmare

Imagine calling a friend. Only instead of hearing a ring tone
you hear a police siren, and then a voice intoning,
“Be careful in your dealings with this person.”

Would that put a damper on your relationship?
It was supposed to.

Welcome to life in China’s “Social Credit System,”
where a low score can ruin your life in more ways than one.

Say you arrive at the Beijing airport, intending to catch a
flight to Canton 1,200 miles south.
The clerk at the ticket counter turns you away because —
you guessed it — your social credit score is too low.

Not only are you publicly humiliated in the ticket line,
you are then forced to travel by slow train.
What should have been a three-hour flight becomes a 30-hour,
stop-and-go nightmare.

All because the government has declared you untrustworthy.
Perhaps you defaulted on a loan,
made the mistake of criticizing some government policy online
or just spent too much time playing video games
on the internet.
All of these actions, and many more, can cause your score
to plummet, forcing citizens onto the most dreaded rung on
China’s deadbeat caste system, the laolai.

And the punishments are shocking. The government algorithm
will go as far as to install an “embarrassing” ring tone
on the phones of laolai,
shaming them every time they get a call in public.

But an embarrassing ring tone, flight bans and slow trains
are just the beginning of the dystopian nightmare that is now
daily life in China for tens of millions of people.

A low social credit score will exclude you from well-paid jobs,
make it impossible for you to get a house or a car loan
or even book a hotel room.
The government will slow down your internet connection,
ban your children from attending private schools
and even post your profile on a public blacklist for all to see.

According to Australia’s ABC News, the government has produced
a “Deadbeat Map” via an app on WeChat, which shows a radar-style
graphic identifying every laolai in the vicinity of the user.

“Tapping on a person marked on the map reveals their personal
information, including their full name, court-case number and
the reason they have been labeled untrustworthy.
Identity-card numbers and home addresses are also partially shown,”
ABC reported.

There are reports that those whose social credit score falls
too low
are preemptively arrested and sent to re-education camps.
Not because they have actually committed a crime,
but because they are likely to.

Elements of the system are in place throughout China, as the
government refines its algorithm,
and the final rollout is scheduled to be in place nationwide
by 2020.

The government claims that its purpose is to enhance trust
and social stability by creating a “culture of sincerity”
that will “restore social trust.”

What it will actually create, of course, is a culture of fear
and a nation of informants.

This is because one of the ways that people can improve their own
social credit score is to report on the supposed misdeeds
of others.

( webtekst )

( tidl. omtalt ) -- ( "lydighetspoeng" )

Den eneste som jakter på "indre fiender" er tante Sofie.
'Agentene' er i så fall katastrofalt plassert, det dreier
seg om ordensmakten selv: politimester Bastian og
'samferdselsministeren' trikkefører Syversen.

Hun vil ha strengere straffer, korporlig avstraffelse av
gutter, og vil avskaffe fest og søtsaker.
Hvis hun hadde levd blant de gamle grekere, ville hun ha
prøvd å omgjøre Kardemomme by til krigerkasernen Sparta.
Er tante Sofie Egners sleivspark til de kalde krigere? ..

Tante Sofie har ennå ikke funnet sin plass i fellesskapet.
Det er det gale med henne. Hun får rett og slett ikke brukt
sin dyktighet, ordenssans og virketrang til fellesskapets
beste ..

Den kalde krigens hovedaktører USA og Sovjetunionen er
nærmest fraværende. Det er kun én henvisning til USA ..
visen "Jeg er en papegøye fra Amerika" .. som belegg for
Egners eget engasjement virker det for spinkelt. Men Maja
insisterer på at vi må vurdere om sangen skal oppfattes
som oppfordring til å etterplapre USA eller omvendt som en
infam latterliggjøring av Amerikas ivrigste venner i Norge,
f.eks Haakon Lie.

( tenketankens grunntekst )

Endel tekster og referanser om DIRTY ELECTRICITY ved Sam Milham

“Smart meters are a public health hazard. ”

Omtaler hos Goodreads

Nevnte vi at solpaneler flest skaper betenkelig bio-fiendtlig
elektrisk belastning - så 'grønne' de liksom var?

om dette, mv. vitner 'helseverket' Mercola -
og omtaler Sam. Milhams bok med flere You-videoer

Dirty Electricity —

Stealth Trigger of Disease Epidemics and Lowered Life Expectancy