Jeg vil anbefale boken til alle som er interessert i forholdet mellom personvern og ytringsfrihet på den ene siden og statens behov for beskyttelse på den andre siden.
Boken beskriver i detalj Gellmans håndtering av dokumentasjon fra Snowden. Interessant er også kapittelet som gir et bilde av hackermiljøet som driver overvåkning, og kulturen i NSA. Gellman har i tillegg til Snowden også intervjuet diverse myndighetspersoner i NSA og CIA. Det gjentakende spørsmålet er hvilke effekt varslingen har hatt - oppveier de positive konsekvensene av varslingen skadevirkningene for amerikansk etterretning.
Introduksjon på Goodreads.com:
"Dark Mirror is the ultimate inside account of the vast global surveillance network that now pervades all our lives.
Barton Gellman’s informant called himself ‘Verax’ - the truth-teller. It was only later that Verax unmasked himself as Edward Snowden. But Gellman’s primary role in bringing Snowden’s revelations to light, for which he shared the Pulitzer Prize, is only the beginning of this gripping real-life spy story. Snowden unlocked the door: here Gellman describes what he found on the other side over the course of a years-long journey of investigation. It is also the story of his own escalating battle against unknown digital adversaries after he discovered his own name on a file in the leaked document trove and realised that he himself was under attack.
Through a gripping narrative of paranoia, clandestine operations and jaw-dropping revelations, Dark Mirror delineates in full for the first time the hidden superstructure that connects government espionage with Silicon Valley. Who is spying on us and why? Here are the answers."
I mange sammenhenger – ikke minst på jobben – legges det vekt på enighet og samhold. Forfatteren gir en rekke eksempler på at det kan det føre til alvorlige feil, til og med ulykker. Det skyldes, mener hun, at enigheten fører til et for snevert perspektiv på bredden av tilgjengelig kunnskap og muligheten for alternative løsninger.
Nemeth bygger først og fremst på sin egen forskning på samstemthet og uenighet i grupper. Alene ville det ha virket svært teknisk og av begrenset interesse, men heldigvis supplerer hun teksten med en rekke praktiske eksempler. De er hentet fra politikk, flyging, medisin, forretningsliv og ikke minst filmen «Tolv edsvorne menn» fra 1957 med Henry Fonda som den standhaftige dissidenten som står imot flertallet. Mest overraskende er likevel at hun bruker Edward Snowden, som i 2013 lekket amerikanske hemmeligstemplede dokumenter, som et gjennomgående eksempel på nytten av uenighet og motstand.
Lettlest med mange oppsummeringer og presiseringer underveis.
The freedom of a country can only be measured by its respect for the rights of its citizens, and it’s my conviction that these rights are in fact limitations of state power that define exactly where and when a government may not infringe into that domain of personal or individual freedoms that during the American Revolution was called “liberty” and during the Internet Revolution is called "privacy"
What makes a life? More than what we say; more, even, than what we do. A life is also what we love, and what we belive in. For me, what I love and belive in the most is connection, human connection, and the technologies by which that is achieved. Those technologies include books, of course. But for my generation, connection has largely meant the Internet.
If most of what people wanted to do online was to be abele to tell their family, friends, and strangers what tjhey were up tp, ant to be told what their family, friends, and strangers were up to in return, then all companies had to do was figure out how to put themselves in the middle of those social exchanges and turn them into profit. This was the beginning of surveillance capitalism, and the end of the Internet as I knew it.
The internet has become almost as integral to our lives as the air through which som many of its communications travel.
Life only scrolls in one direction, which is the direction of time, and no matter how far we might manage to go, that invisible wall will always be just behind us, cutting us off from the past, compelling us on into the unknown.
The generations to come would have to get used to a world in which surveillance wasn`t something occasional and directed in legally justified circumstances, but a constant and indiscriminate presence: the ear that always hears, the eye that always sees, a memory that is sleepless and permanent.
We are the first people in the history of the planet for whom this is true, the first people to be burdened whith data immortality, the fact that our collected records, might have an eternalexistence. This is why we have a special duty. We must ensure that these records of our pasts cant`t be turned against us, or turned against our children.
Interessant historie. Litt omstendelig, kanskje litt for raskt skrevet eller oversatt?