The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing

av (editor).

OUP Oxford 2008 Hardcover

4 bokelskere følger dette verket.

Kjøp boken hos

Se på denne utgaven hos amazon.co.uk Kjøp boka hos ark.no

Bjarte Foshaugs eksemplar av The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing

Lesetilstand

Leser denne nå

Hylle

Vitenskap

Lesedato

Ingen lesedato

Favoritt

Ingen favoritt

Terningkast

Ingen terningkast

Min omtale

Ingen omtale


Bokdetaljer

Forlag OUP Oxford

Utgivelsesår 2008

Format Hardcover

ISBN13 9780199216802

Språk Engelsk

Sider 448

Finn boka på biblioteket

Du kan velge et fast favorittbibliotek under innstillinger.

Finner du ikke ditt favorittbibliotek på lista? Send oss e-post til admin@bokelskere.no med navn på biblioteket og fylket det ligger i. Kanskje vi kan legge det til!


Bokomtaler

Ingen omtaler ennå.

Skriv en omtale Se alle omtaler av verket

Diskusjoner om boka

Ingen diskusjoner ennå.

Start en diskusjon om verket Se alle diskusjoner om verket

Sitater fra dette verket

As you are reading these words, you are taking part in one of the wonders of the natural world. For you and I belong to a species with a remarkable ability: we can shape events in each other's brains with exquisite precision. I am not referring to telepathy or mind control or the other obsessions of fringe science; even in the depictions of believers these are blunt instruments compared to an ability that is uncontroversially present in every one of us. That ability is language. Simply by making noises with our mouths, we can reliably cause precise new combinations of ideas to arise in each other's minds. The ability comes so naturally that we are apt to forget what a miracle it is.

-fra The language instinct av Steven Pinker

Godt sagt! (3) Varsle Svar

Wonder is a word to wonder about. It contains a mixture of messages: something marvellous and miraculous, surprising, raising unanswerable questions about it self, making the observer wonder, even raising sceptical questions like, 'I wonder about that'. Miraculous and marvellous are clues; both words come from an ancient Indo-European root meaning simply to smile or to laugh. Anything wonderful is something to smile in the presence of, in admiration (which, by the way, comes from the same root, along with, of all telling words, 'mirror').

-fra Seven wonders av Lewis Thomas

Godt sagt! (2) Varsle Svar

The man who is thoroughly convinced of the universal operation of the law of causation cannot for a moment entertain the idea of a being who interferes in the course of events - provided, of course, that he takes the hypothesis of causality really seriously. He has no use of the religion of fear and equally little for social or moral religion. A God who rewards and punishes is inconceivable to him for the simple reason that a man's actions are determined by necessity, external and internal, so that in God's eyes he cannot be responsible, any more than an inanimate object is responsible for the motions it undergoes. Science has therefore been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is injust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.

-fra Religion and science av Albert Einstein

Godt sagt! (2) Varsle Svar

Enclosed in darkness so complete I could not see beyond my outstretched hand, I was forced to think of the rain forest as though I were seated in my library at home, with the lights turned low. The forest at night is an experience in sensory deprivation most of the time, black and silent as the midnight zone of a cave. Life is out there in expected abundance. The jungle teems, but in a manner mostly beyond reach of the human senses. Ninety-nine percent of the animals find their way by chemical trails laid over the surface, puffs of odor released into the air or water, and scents diffused out of little hidden glands and into the air downwind. Animals are masters of this chemical channel, where we are idiots. But we are geniuses of the audiovisual channel, equaled in this modality only by a few odd groups (whales, monkeys, birds). So we wait for the dawn, while they wait for the fall of darkness; and because sight and sound are the evolutionary prerequisites of intelligence, we alone have come to reflect on such matters as Amazon nights and sensory modalities.

-fra The diversity of life av Edward O. Wilson

Godt sagt! (1) Varsle Svar

Ruin is the destination toward which all men rush, each pursuing his own best interest in a society that believes in the freedom of the commons. Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all.
Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! In a sense, it was learned thousands of years ago, but natural selection favors the forces of psychological denial. The individual benefits as an individual from his ability to deny the truth even though society as a whole, of which he is a part, suffers.

-fra The tragedy of the commons av Garrett Hardin

Godt sagt! (1) Varsle Svar

Our ability to understand the universe and our position in it is one of the glories of the human species. Our ability to link mind to mind by language, and especially to transmit our thoughts across centuries is another. Science and literature, then, are the two achievements of Homo sapiens that most convincingly justify the specific name.

-fra introduksjonen av Richard Dawkins

Godt sagt! (0) Varsle Svar

Legg inn et nytt sitat Se alle sitater fra verket