36 known coronaviruses -- What are they testing for?

As Dr Tenpenny says, “When they said, ‘Well,
everybody’s got to get tested.’ What are they testing for?

( se poengfylt læresamtale her >

If there are 36 known coronaviruses that have been around for six
decades – for sixty years, these viruses have been known and been
typed and it’s an RNA virus, so each time it goes through
somebody … it morphs into a new subtype.

What are they testing for? Are they testing for the fact that you
had coronavirus influenza-like illness 7 years ago
and now you have an antibody to that? Is that what they’re finding?

Are they specifically looking for the SARS-CoV2 antibody? Has it
been around long enough for anybody to do that?

We know there are at least 30 sub-strains of that virus.
We keep talking about ‘The Virus’, like there is one.

There’s the virus … from the beginning, the Wuhan virus outbreak
and whatever it was, was different than was happening in Iran;
different than what was happening in Italy; different than
New York; different than California –
and even The New York Times ran an article, that said they know
there’s at least 30 of subtypes of this family of this particular
virus, already … so what are we testing for?

… if you get an IgG antibody, does that mean you’re currently sick
and you’re recovered or does that mean that you had an IgG antibody
from the virus that you had 17 years ago? What does that mean?

And if you have an IgM antibody and you are completely asymptomatic,
does that mean you’re ‘infected’ and you might be like Typhoid Mary,
spreading stuff around?

“They mixed all that data together, they threw it all in a pot,
so none of it has any validity, none of it. None of it!

And since we don’t know what the true denominator is, we have no
understanding about incidence and prevalence and … the death rate
is absolutely irrelevant.”

The question becomes, ‘What the Hell are they going to put in
the vaccine?’

To date, vaccines have NEVER BEEN TESTED for:

• synergistic toxicity
• carcinogenic potential
• mutagenic potential
• teratogenicity (causing birth defects)
• potential to impair fertility

Godt sagt! (1) Varsle Svar

Sist sett

NerakntschjrldAnne Berit GrønbechMarit HøvdePiippokattaTurid KjendlieVioleta JakobsenHarald KsomniferumStig TKirsten LundRune U. FurbergChristofer GabrielsenTheaJan Arne NygaardIngunn STor-Arne JensenTine VictoriaMarianne_Hanne Kvernmo RyeVannflaskeGodemineSigrid Blytt TøsdalAnita NessIngvild SBeathe SolbergritaolineBookiacJakob SæthreSol SkipnesBente NogvaReadninggirl30mgeAstrid Terese Bjorland SkjeggerudLinda NyrudWenche VargasKatrinGVibekeAvaCarine Olsrød