skjer i neste uke:
EU vil måtte innføre 'Vaksine-passet'.
Fase to av diktaturet Covid: Fangestaten er her.
Men EUs glansnummer var å kunne reise uten pass,
så de vokter seg og kaller passet et 'sertifikat'
Hvorfor skulle de vel slippe deg inn på et rutefly
om du ikke har veterinærattest: "Ferdig smittet".
Ikke 'smittefri', det lar seg aldri garantere.
Hvorfor skulle de vel slippe deg inn på Kjøpesenteret
OverFloden, forresten, uten en lydighetsattest?
Uten Stikket i Armen: Null reise- og virkefrihet.
Fyldigere artikkel på utenlandsk: - Les her -
/
Det begynte med undertrykkende restriksjoner og
et eget politi til å bevåke antatt smitteutrygg
opptreden, som var voldelig alvorlig holdningsforbrytelse.
Helse-etatens diktatur? Snarere politisk diktatur
under hvite frakker.
Å stå imot en helseetats mange fareskilt, måtte ikke det
være fiendskap mot hele tvangsstaten og samfunnet?
Altså: Statens vilje i hvit frakk.
Politisk ledelse i alle klodens land trådte til side
for $Bill Gates og 'VerdensHelserådet' som brått var
enerådende ekspertise.
Kritisk tenkning er avsatt som ulydighet,
om du så er tung professor i immunologi etc.
Den ferdig vaksinerte kan uten videre bli smittebærer,
farligere enn oss aldri smittede, som 'tiltakene'
skulle holde i kraven.
Hva er det da 'sertifikatet' fastslår som sikkert?
Plikten til å ta imot Vaksinen, den er fyrtårnet.
Behandling av den Covid-rammede finnes ikke, enda så
alment den er blitt dokumentert - gjennom 100 år.
Åpent er det bekjent at Vaksinen varig endrer din
arvekode: Virusfragmenter skal du produsere all din dag
og sprute ned alt folket med.
Andre tiltak er da overflødige.
Men vi måtte alle Caramba bli Gen-modifiserte organismer!
Nå er det ikke strengt hemmeligholdt at visse eliter
ivrer for sterk nedskjæring av 'vår' klodes befolkning -
og har søkt sine metoder.
Var så ikke Covid-metoden drastisk nok,
geni-vanvittig nok?
/
Flere små artikler med litt spark i:
Biologisk umulige sprang -- noen spørsmål
Farma-gigant Merck tror ikke mer på Covid-vaksine
Kommunen ville stifte Perfekt religion?
Hele pandemien -- krigslist og lureri?
Viser 2 svar.
You want real science and known facts.
Here you go.
The mRNA vaccines cause the body to produce spike proteins.
This cannot be turned off, as the cells are reprogrammed using
an artificial virus.
Did you not know that Moderna and Pfizer’s “vaccine” is an
artificial virus?
A virus is a genetic instruction set in a protein envelope that
attaches itself to a host cell, and reprograms it to produce new
viral instruction sets that are sent out to infect other cells.
The “vaccine” is an instruction set in a lipid envelope that sets
out to attach itself to host cells and reprogram them to produce
new proteins, along with mRNA copies that will infect other cells,
causing them to join the party.
mRNA is an instruction set that rewrites DNA in order to reproduce
a new modified version of the cell. The modified cell is now a
spike protein factory.
The PCR test is looking for the genetic sequence of these proteins.
Running it above 30 cycles pretty much guarantees it will pick up
any sequence similar to the supposed SARS-CoV-2 genetic markers.
The proteins generated by the “vaccines” will absolutely cause the
PCR test to return a positive result.
Our political masters know this. The massive push for the vaccines
is absolutely about making sure the “pandemic” can continue
indefinitely.
Any vaccinated person will test positive for many months,
perhaps even years.
Also, case number increases are irrelevant until deaths correlate
with them.
Viruses virtually always mutate into a more contagious, less
dangerous form.
Viruses are parasitic, and the most successful parasite spreads
easily and does not kill its host.
Those that mutate to more dangerous form kill their means of
transmission, and quickly disappear.
Panic over case numbers of “variants”, the new and improved name
for mutations, is as valid as panicking over case numbers
of dandruff.
Case numbers are of no concern. Only effects are.
As long as Covid tests are required for medical procedures,
travel, employment, etc. the positive cases will continue. . . .
If they didn't lose potency as they spread, there wouldn't be a
single species of animal left on the planet!
( kilde )
36 known coronaviruses -- What are they testing for?
As Dr Tenpenny says, “When they said, ‘Well,
everybody’s got to get tested.’ What are they testing for?
( se poengfylt læresamtale her >
If there are 36 known coronaviruses that have been around for six
decades – for sixty years, these viruses have been known and been
typed and it’s an RNA virus, so each time it goes through
somebody … it morphs into a new subtype.
What are they testing for? Are they testing for the fact that you
had coronavirus influenza-like illness 7 years ago
and now you have an antibody to that? Is that what they’re finding?
Are they specifically looking for the SARS-CoV2 antibody? Has it
been around long enough for anybody to do that?
We know there are at least 30 sub-strains of that virus.
We keep talking about ‘The Virus’, like there is one.
There’s the virus … from the beginning, the Wuhan virus outbreak
and whatever it was, was different than was happening in Iran;
different than what was happening in Italy; different than
New York; different than California –
and even The New York Times ran an article, that said they know
there’s at least 30 of subtypes of this family of this particular
virus, already … so what are we testing for?
… if you get an IgG antibody, does that mean you’re currently sick
and you’re recovered or does that mean that you had an IgG antibody
from the virus that you had 17 years ago? What does that mean?
And if you have an IgM antibody and you are completely asymptomatic,
does that mean you’re ‘infected’ and you might be like Typhoid Mary,
spreading stuff around?
“They mixed all that data together, they threw it all in a pot,
so none of it has any validity, none of it. None of it!
And since we don’t know what the true denominator is, we have no
understanding about incidence and prevalence and … the death rate
is absolutely irrelevant.”
The question becomes, ‘What the Hell are they going to put in
the vaccine?’
To date, vaccines have NEVER BEEN TESTED for:
• synergistic toxicity
• carcinogenic potential
• mutagenic potential
• teratogenicity (causing birth defects)
• potential to impair fertility