Bokelskere.no

" I got to see the results of vaccination on their kidneys "

It may seem odd that a medical doctor with 19 years of experience
has passionately turned away from the practice of vaccination.

(..) Like most doctors, I received a cursory summary of the
childhood and adult vaccine schedules
and was told that vaccines are safe and effective
and to give them on schedule.
I never questioned the vaccine schedule and was largely
agnostic about it.

After nearly two decades of working in the conventional medical
system, several things converged to launch me into a new way
of thinking.
I never would have predicted that the medical establishment
would present itself to me as a blatant violator of life
or conflict with my moral and spiritual principles . . .
but it did.

..during the winter of 2009 when the H1N1 flu vaccine was given
as a separate injection from the seasonal flu vaccine ..
Many doctors were skeptical of the practice of influenza
vaccination, and many of my hospital colleagues signed some
exemption form and dodged the vaccine for themselves.

However, there were trusting patients who did not have the
discernment to refuse, and I got to see the potential result
of vaccination on their kidneys.

That winter, three patients in close succession were wheeled into
the emergency room of my hospital with total kidney shutdown.

When I arrived to talk to them, each one volunteered to me,
“I was fine until I had that vaccine.”

All three had normal kidney function at baseline, as per
their outpatient records. All three required acute dialysis,
two eventually recovered, and one died of complications
several months later, supposedly from his other illnesses.

After this series of events, I began to take vaccine histories
on each of my patients and was startled at the connections
that could be made just by asking, “When was your last vaccine?”

In my opinion, many cases of supposedly idiopathic (medical term
for unknown) kidney disease are not idiopathic at all.

During the weeks of dialyzing the three kidney-failure patients,
I passed the chief of internal medicine in the hallway.
He was someone I had always had a good relationship with,
and we were on excellent terms.
He asked me the usual, “How are you doing? How is the
nephrology practice going?”
I decided to tell him what was happening and how I thought
the flu vaccine was causing problems.
After conveying a small bit of my observations, he became stiff,
his face tightened, his body language changed,
and he asked me why I was blaming the vaccine.
“They just got the flu, and the vaccine didn’t have time to work,”
was his curt response.

Over the following months, I first made it my business to find out
everything I could about safety trials for vaccines in kidney patients.

I was shocked to find that there were no trials on these types of patients.
I was told they could tolerate vaccines because these are “safe
and effective.”
On seeing that safety of vaccines in acutely ill (active heart failure,
sepsis, cancer, autoimmune disease) and chronic nephrology patients
was a myth,
I decided to research the chief of internal medicine’s assumptions
about the flu vaccine, smallpox, and polio history.

What I encountered threw me into a tailspin that ultimately led me
to become a full time researcher on the immune system and vaccination.

I came to realize that the guidelines, evidence, and opinions
of the leaders were unsound
and were NOT leading the herds to authentic health.

What was most puzzling to me was how I was treated when I tried
to protect my own kidney-failure patients from being vaccinated —
especially when they were ill.

After an attempt to get the hospital to defer vaccinating for
pneumonia and influenza until the day of hospital discharge
instead of admission,
I was told not to interfere with the vaccination protocol.

( / / )

This was the first time in my career that my opinion regarding
kidney failure was not respected.
Any other time I suggested that a drug was responsible for
kidney damage, that drug was immediately discontinued —
no questions asked.
This happens routinely with certain blood pressure drugs,
antibiotics, pain killers, etc.

Sometimes kidneys can react to drugs in an allergic fashion —
to any drug at any time — and that drug would have been stopped.
Some drugs cause direct toxicity to the kidneys,
and in the past if I suggested to stop or avoid them,
they were always avoided.
But now I was unable to protect my own kidney-failure patients
from vaccinations given in the hospital.

Questioning the vaccines seemed to open an entire Pandora’s box
that apparently had yellow tape over the lock,
along with the message, “Do not cross.”
I was met with doublespeak —
permitted to write an order to stop a vaccine that was to be given
if I got there in time, but I was also told that I was doing it
too often
and that I should not interfere with the hospital’s vaccination policy.

When I pointed out the connection between vaccines and worsening
or new-onset kidney failure to a couple of open-minded colleagues,
they understood, started taking vaccine histories,
and saw what was happening.
Yet they remained silent.

Most doctors continue to practice with comfortable indifference.

Some see the errors, damage, and limits of their practices but still
walk lockstep with the herd and protect the brotherhood.

I don’t know what it will take to get these doctors to resist the
dictates who rule over them.
I’ve had far more success reasoning with parents and intelligent people
who are not attached to traditions
that are damaging, unscientific, and not even supported by our own
medical literature.

This book is for those who want to read what I have discovered, after
years of research,
to be a much more accurate depiction of vaccination history.

( Suzanne Humphries, MD -- grundig forelesning over boken her )
  Dissolving Illusions: The Information You Wish You Had Known Before

SANITATION versus VACCINATION - a 1912 book (J.T.Biggs) i overblikk
-

"No man is good enough to govern another man
without that other's consent."

– Abraham Lincoln (1809..1865)

"I assert that it is beyond the functions of law to dictate
a medical procedure, or enforce any scientific theory."

– Professor F. W. Newman (1805–1897) October 26, 1874

Forfatters webside har en leselenke > til utvalg av boktekst

Aktuelt: 'Kurante' vaksiner inneholder død 60-årig baby

There are hundreds of examples in the field of medicine
where fundamentally flawed ideas have gained public support

and were kept alive by belief momentum:
Eugenics,
numerous psychiatric diagnoses,
harmful drugs like thalidomide,
fever reducers, diethylstilbestrol, bloodletting,
and unbalanced hormone replacement

are several examples of faulty ideas that have historically
attained a level of scientific and societal legitimacy.

Not only have these strange types of beliefs been accepted,
but in the midst of their unquestioned superiority,
better ideas were overlooked.

In the hope of preventing disease, vaccination took hold as
the only way to combat smallpox.
The original belief was that vaccination was a safe way
to acquire lifelong immunity.

This turned out to be untrue, and thus had to be redressed as
a “temporary way of making smallpox milder.”
Even though revaccinations were required yearly for some
people,
even though there was great success using isolation and
disinfection after abandoning vaccination in Leicester,

and even though there were large numbers of vaccination-
related deaths and vaccine failures,
devotion to vaccination by the medical profession became
firmly established.