Bokelskere.no

kan KATALOGverk STRAFFE negre, eller Jøder ?

What would happen if the phone company started deciding about
who could have a listing in their master directory?
What if they simply dropped out people who were discovered to
be Republicans or Democrats?
What if they deleted people because they had a certain skin
color? Or national origin? Or religion?

While on one hand, the phone company was willing to connect and
charge for service in everybody’s home,
those suppressed individuals would only be able to make
outbound calls and they would seldom receive any inbound calls.

Would America ever tolerate this? Of course not.
In fact, it would spark a national uproar of epic proportions.

So, can anyone explain why Google is getting a free pass on hiding
the particulars of its indexing algorithms from public consumers
of information?

It would be bad enough if Google simply dropped out certain pieces
of information, but they have gone way beyond this by rearranging
the results it chooses to release and presenting them
in such a manner to show an alternate reality that purposely
misleads the public.

This is what is called “weaponizing data”
to actively and intentionally lead people to false conclusions
in order to modify their behavior.

To say this is wrong is an understatement.
To say it is illegal is complicated, but it is certainly possible.

Inngrep annonsert KEISERLIG nok? >

( kilde: technocracy.news )

"Google has now flatly stated its intent to influence and control
public perception so as to manipulate and determine national
political election outcomes.
It does this by using AI algorithms to skew search results,
presenting their political views, and suppressing dissenting or
alternative views.

lett å fikse?